MOHD SADIQ v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH REVENUE DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/473/2020 · 2026-07-13
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No.473/2020
Mohd. Sadiq …..Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Priyanshu Sharma, Advocate Vs
Union Territory of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Assisting Counsel to Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 13.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the grievance raised in the present writ petition stands redressed. He further submits that, on instructions, he does not wish to press the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, along with all connected CM(s), if any.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 13.07.2026 Shammi
Sr. No. 18