Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2020 DAILYLAW 784 (RAJ)

SUNIL DUTT SON OF SHRI PRAKASH CHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5266/2020 · 2026-03-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5266/2020 Sunil Dutt Son Of Shri Prakash Chand, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Behind Deeg Chungi, Kasba Nagar, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Mahesh Chand Son Of Shri Kaluwa Ram, Aged About 50 Years, Resident Of Behind Deeg Chungi, Kasba Nagar, Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. N.S.Dhakar-PP None Present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 438/2020 registered with Police Station Nagar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341 and 354(B) IPC. 2. The contents and grounds taken in the instant petition indicate that the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever and that a false concocted story has been created by the complainant to falsely implicate the petitioner, hence, a prayer has been made for quashing of the impugned FIR. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the factual report received from the SHO, Police Station Brij Nagar, District Deeg on 27.03.2026, apprised this Court that after thorough investigation (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5266/2020] in the instant matter, a prima facie case was found to be proved against the petitioner under Sections 451, 323, 341 and 34 IPC. Accordingly, a charge-sheet was submitted against the petitioner on 23.11.2020 and the same was also submitted before the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Nagar, District Deeg on 20.02.2021. 4. The correctness of the allegation cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of its power contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of this case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to take all available defence and grounds which have been taken before this Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial before the Trial Court 6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/59