M/S MATRAKRIPA TRANSFORMS v. SOBRAN SINGH S/O SHRI HOTILAL CHAUDHARY B/C JAT
CRLMP/13/2020 · 2026-03-13
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 776 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 13/2020
1. M/s Matrakripa Transforms, E-24, Riico Industrial Area, Bapi, Tehsil Dausa, District Dausa, Raj., Through Partners.
2. Ramji Lal Sharma S/o Shri Ganga Sahay Sharma, R/o 67, Usha Vihar, Gopalpura, Jaipur, Raj., At Present Partner M/s Matrikripa Transforms.
3. Smt. Asha Sharma W/o Shri Shankarlal Sharma, R/o 44, Nandpuri, Hawa Sadak, 22 Godam, Jaipur, Raj., At Present Partner M/s Matrikripa Transforms.
4. Shri Anandswroop Swami S/o Shri Jayaramdas Swami, R/o Village Ghatada, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Raj., At Present Partner M/s Matrikripa Transforms.
5. Shri Pramod Kumar Swami S/o Shri Jayaramdas Swami, R/o Village Ghatada, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar, Raj., At Present Partner M/s Matrikripa Transforms. ----Petitioners Versus Sobran Singh S/o Shri Hotilal Chaudhary, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Quarter No.18, Civil Lines, Dausa, District Dausa, Raj. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP M. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the proceedings of criminal case No.1308/2019 filed by the complainant-respondent against the accused-petitioners before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-13/2020] Magistrate, Dausa under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Contents of the petition indicate that a cheque was issued by an authorized signatory of the firm M/s Matrakripa Transforms and the petitioners have been shown as partners of the said firm. It has been averred in the petition that not all the partners are responsible for dishonor of the cheque, hence, the proceedings arising out of the complaint are not maintainable against the petitioners.
3. Perusal of the order-sheets indicate that till date, cognizance has not been taken and the trial has not proceeded any further. If at all, the petitioners are having any rightful cause or defence in this regard, they would be at liberty to take all objections at the appropriate stage of the trial.
4. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/3