OM RAJ v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH D G P JAMMU AND OTHERS.
CRM(M)/286/2020 · 2026-05-20
Rajesh Sekhri
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 774 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 286/2020
Om Raj
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan K. Kundal, Advocate. q
vs
UT of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.05.2026
01. Statements of the petitioner and respondent No. 4-the complainant, at whose instance impugned FIR No. 87/2020 came to be registered, have been reduced into writing before learned Registrar Judicial of this Court. The complainant has stated that he has arrived at an amicable settlement with the petitioner. He has resolved all the disputes, issues and misunderstandings and has no objection to quashment of impugned FIR. Parties have been identified by their respective counsels.
02. In the light of amicable settlement between the parties, present petition is allowed, as a result, impugned FIR is quashed.
03.
Disposed of, along with connected application(s).
04. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 20.05.2026 Sushant
Sr. No. 63