BABU LAL RAIGAR S/O SH. SHARWAN LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4166/2020 · 2026-03-28
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 768 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 768 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4166/2020 Babu Lal Raigar S/o Sh. Sharwan Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Raithal, Ps Kala Dera, Distt. Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. Sho, Ps Kala Dera, Distt. Jaipur.
3. Smt. Pinky Devi W/o Sh. Babu Lal Raigar D/o Sh. Om, R/o Raithal, Tehsil Amer, PS Kala Dera Distt. Jaipur, Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) for Complainant(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar-PP None Present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 36/2020, registered with Police Station Kaladera, Jaipur (Rural) for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 406, 341 and 323 IPC.
2. The contents and grounds taken in the instant petition indicate that a false complaint has been filed against the petitioner and that the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever. The allegations regarding alleged torture upon the complainant are false and no demand for dowry was ever made, rather the complainant herself left the matrimonial home and residing with Jagdish Prasad Raigar in an illicit relationship.
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-4166/2020]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the factual report received from the SHO, Police Station Kaladera, Jaipur (Rural) on 27.03.2026, apprised this Court that after thorough investigation in the instant matter, prima facie case was found to be proved against the petitioner for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC and accordingly, charge sheet was submitted against the petitioner on 21.08.2020 before the Court of Metropolitan Judicial Magistrate, Chomu.
4. The correctness of the allegations levelled against the petitioner cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of its power contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C., certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer.
5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to take all available defence and grounds, which have been taken before this Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial.
6. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/58