PAPPU LAL MEENA SON OF LATE SHRI CHHITAR LAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5853/2020 · 2026-03-28
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5853/2020
1. Pappu Lal Meena Son of Late Shri Chhitar Lal Meena, R/o In Front of Water Works, Meena Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur
2. Hanuman Sahay Meena Son of Late Shri Chhitar Lal Meena, R/o In Front of Water Works, Meena Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur
3. Ganga Sahay Meena Son of Late Shri Chhitar Lal Meena, R/o In Front of Water Works, Meena Colony, Malviya Na- gar, Jaipur
4. Ganesh Meena Son of Late Shri Chhitar Lal Meena, R/o In Front of Water Works, Meena Colony, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
2. Raj Kishore Son of Ganpat Lal, R/o Jhalna Lapord Re- serve, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : Mr. N.S.Dhakar-PP None present JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 254/2020 registered with Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offences punish- able under Sections 332 and 353 IPC. 2. The contents and grounds taken in the instant petition indicate that the petitioners have not committed any offence whatsoever
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-5853/2020] and that a false concocted story has been created by the com- plainant to falsely implicate the petitioners, hence, a prayer has been made for quashing of the impugned FIR. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor on the basis of the factual report dated 30.03.2026 received from the SHO, Police Station Malviya Nagar, Jaipur East, apprised this Court that after thorough investi- gation in the instant matter, a prima facie case was found to be proved against the petitioners under Sections 332, 353 and 34 IPC and accordingly, a charge-sheet was submitted against the peti- tioners on 24.12.2021. 4. The correctness of the allegations cannot be examined by this Court in exercise of its power contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C., certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition, granting liberty to the petitioners to take all avail- able defence and grounds which have been taken before this Court, at the appropriate stage of the trial before the Trial Court
6.
Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dis- posed of (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/60