Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2020 DAILYLAW 756 (RAJ)

SHAKTI SINGH S/O JAGDISH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5713/2020 · 2026-03-30

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5713/2020 1. Shakti Singh S/o Jagdish Singh, R/o Harnath Singh Ki Dhani, Police Station Ranoli, Distt. Sikar Raj. 2. Narayan Singh S/o Umed Singh, R/o Harnath Singh Ki Dhani, Police Station Ranoli, Distt. Sikar Raj. 3. Virendra @ Veeru Singh S/o Shivdayal Singh, R/o Sujawas, Police Station Ranoli, Distt. Sikar. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Inadar Singh S/o Mahaveer Singh, R/o Ward No. 9, Ranoli, P.s. Ranoli, Distt. Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Garima Soni for Mr. Jaideep Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/03/2026 1. By way of filing the present petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No. 322/2020, registered with Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 458, 384 and 506 IPC. 2. The contents of the petition indicate that there is no iota of evidence regarding the petitioners' involvement in the alleged incident and they have been falsely implicated in the present case, therefore, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made in the petition. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5713/2020] 4. The document annexed with the petition indicates that the informant does not wish to prosecute the petitioners and an application in this regard has been submitted to the Superintendent of Police. In case, the parties have settled their dispute, the informant may appear before the Investigating Officer, where a supplementary statement can be recorded and the factum of compromise between the parties may be verified and accordingly, a final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. may be submitted before the concerned Court. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/73