GHULAM MUSTAFA v. S H O POLICE STATION GURSAI POONCH.
CRM(M)/314/2020 · 2026-02-27
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 755 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 755 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 77
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 314/2020
Ghulam Mustafa
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- None.
V/s
SHO Police Station Gurasi Poonch
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
27.02.2026
1. The record reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 16.08.2022. Thereafter, the matter was listed on 22.02.2023, on which date the matter was adjourned at the request of proxy counsel for the petitioner. The matter was again adjourned on 11.12.2023 at request of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Pursuant thereto, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner on
23.05.2025. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite notice.
2. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the instant matter, accordingly, the instant matter is dismissed for non- prosecution Interim direction if any shall stand vacated
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu: 27.02.2026 Javid Iqbal