HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 58/2020 Rameshwar Sharma S/o Jagannath, aged about 41 Years, R/o Papali Ki Dhani, Jawahar Circle, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through PP. 2. Jabbar Mal Chindaliya S/o Shri Chandan Mal, Partners Sujas Developers L.L.P.S. 1, Mayur Tower, Neharu Bazar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.S.L. Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr.Adeet Srivastava for Mr.Sanjay Srivastava JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 30/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for quashing of the impugned F.I.R. No.1022/2014, registered with the Police Station Jawahar Circle, District Jaipur (East) for the offences under Sections 420, 406, 388, 389 & 120-B of IPC on the basis of the compromise dated 09.11.2015 arrived at between the parties. 2. The parties have put in appearance in-person and complainant accepts the factum of compromise being arrived at between the parties and he no objection in case, the proceedings pending before the trial Court are quashed and he does not wish to prosecute the petitioner. (2 of 3) [CRLMP-58/2020] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Additional Civil Judge (Sr.Div.)-cum-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate No.2, Jaipur Metropolitan vide order dated 02.08.2019 accepted the application in part and compounded the offence under Sections 420 & 406 IPC, but permission has been declined for rest of the offences, i.e., Sections 388, 389 & 120-B IPC as these offences are not compoundable. Counsel submits that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature and on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the parties, the pending proceedings may be quashed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and in the case of The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the arguments raised by counsel for the petitioner. 6. In view of the aforesaid compromise, looking to the allegations which are personal in nature and also applying the principle laid down by the Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court contained, under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and orders to compound the remaining offences, i.e., offences under Sections 388, 389 & 120-B IPC. 7. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The petitioner is discharged from the charge under Sections 388, 389 & 120-B IPC. The proceedings of impugned F.I.R. No.1022/2014, registered with the Police Station Jawahar (3 of 3) [CRLMP-58/2020] Circle, District Jaipur (East) against the petitioners stand quashed and set-aside. 8. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 9. The parties have been duly identified by their respective counsels. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /113