POOJA MATHUR D/O KRISAN KUMAR MATHUR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/4970/2020 · 2026-03-17
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 746 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 746 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4970/2020 Pooja Mathur D/o Krisan Kumar Mathur, Aged About 25 Years, R/o P.No. B-608, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2. Shankar Lal Khatik S/o Amar Chand, R/o Nathdwara, Rajsamand, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Simran for Ms. Meenakshi Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 17/03/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to the impugned FIR No.48/2014 registered with Police Station Jalupura, Jaipur (South) for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not committed any offence whatsoever, in-spite of above, she has been falsely booked in the instant case, hence, interference of this Court is warranted.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that after thorough investigation in the instant matter, charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner and the alleged offences were found to be prima facie proved
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-4970/2020] against the petitioner, hence, interference of this Court is not warranted.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
5. Perusal of the allegations levelled against the petitioner in the FIR reveals commission of cognizable offence. Correctness of the allegations cannot be adjudged by this Court under its inherent jurisdiction contained under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
6. Looking to the fact that after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner before the competent court, in the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner can take all available defence before the Trial Court at appropriate stage of trial.
7. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/45