Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 665 (CHH)

RAJENDRA SINGH THAKUR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/515/2020 · 2026-08-30

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (WPS No. 515 of 2020) CGHC010024602020 2026:CGHC:38337 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 515 of 2020 1 - Rajendra Singh Thakur S/o Shri Ram Khilawan Singh Aged About 52 Years R/o Village And Post- Patharia, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ravi Kumar Sharma S/o Brijbhushan Prasad Sharma Aged About 50 Years R/o Village- Pathargadhi, Post- Chhindbhog, Tahsil- Patharia, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Vinod Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Ambik Prasad Pandey Aged About 52 Years R/o Village - Lata, Post- Amora, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Pramod Kumar Pandey S/o Shri Ambika Prasad Pandey Aged About 58 Years R/o Village- Lata, Post- Amora, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Under Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of General Administration, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Patharia, District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.09.01 10:47:23 +0530 2 (WPS No. 515 of 2020) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :- Ms. Pranoti Das, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate For State :- Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 31.08 .202 6 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant writ petition with liberty to file afresh with an additional material. 2. With the aforesaid liberty, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!