Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 WPS No. 1571 of 2020
CGHC010070622020
2026:CGHC:38129
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1571 of 2020 Smt. Ranjeeta Patwa W/o Vineet Patwa Aged About 33 Years, Working On The Post Of Teacher (L.B.) Posted At Govt. Girls Higher Secondary School Sakari District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. The Secretary Department Of Urban Administration And Development, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
3. The District Education Officer Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
4. The Block Education Officer Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
5. Jonal Commissioner Jon No. 1 Sakari Municipal Corporation Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate. For State :- Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent No.5 :- Ms. Swati Agrawal, Advocate, appears on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate. SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 25.08.2026
1. Heard. ANKIT KUMAR SINGH Digitally signed by ANKIT KUMAR SINGH
2 WPS No. 1571 of 2020
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that petitioner has already make representations (Annexure P/10) for grant of pending salary from May 2015 to July 2016, before the Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Sakri, District Bilaspur and Block Education Officer, Takhatpur, District Bilaspur, however, the same has not been decided yet, therefore, he prays for direction to decide the same within the stipulated time.
3. Be that as it may, the concerned respondent/competent authority is directed to decide the petitioner’s representations (Annexure P/10) for grant of pending salary from May, 2015 to July, 2016 within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order on its own merits by passing speaking and reasoned order. However, it is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
4. With the aforesaid observation / direction the instant writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge Ankit