Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 641 (CHH)

UJJWAL DHAR DIWAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4139/2020 · 2026-08-19

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (WPS No. 4139 of 2020) CGHC010225102020 2026:CGHC:37351 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4139 of 2020 1 - Ujjwal Dhar Diwan C/o Gouri Shankar Diwan Aged About 33 Years R/o Police Line, Rudri, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Pradeep Diwakar S/o Susheel Diwakar Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 16, Kududand, Jai Stambh Chowk, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Deputy Inspector General Of Police Police Headquarters, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (Chhattisgarh), District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Superintendent Of Police, Bemetara, District Bemetara (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Superintendent Of Police, Kondagaon, District Kondagaon (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Superintendent Of Police Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh), District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Mr. Amitesh Yadav, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Yogeshwar Sharma, Advocate For State :- Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Advocate ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.08.20 18:16:26 +0530 2 (WPS No. 4139 of 2020) SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 20.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have made a representation before the respondent authority for not deducting certain deductions from their salary, which were deducted vide Annexure P/2, P/3 & P/4, but the same has not been decided till date. 2. Be that as it may, if the representation of the petitioners has not been considered and decided till date, the concerned respondent authority is directed to consider and decide the same within 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order on its own merit strictly in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid direction and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!