Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2020 DAILYLAW 628 (UTT)

PRASHANT VERMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1056/2020 · 2026-07-17

Alok Mahra

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS UKHC010065202020 WPCRL/1056/2020 Prashant Verma --Petitioner Versus State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Ms. Lata Negi proxy counsel for Ms. Neetu Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Prabhat Kandpal, learned A.G.A. along with Mr. Nikhil Bisht, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel would submit that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the charge-sheet has been submitted before the competent court. It is, therefore, contended that the relief sought in the writ petition no longer survives and the petition has consequently become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the criminal writ petition has become infructuous and is accordingly dismissed. 5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Alok Mahra, J.) 17-07-2026 mamta