Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 586 (CHH)

SMT. REENA GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2111/2020 · 2026-02-18

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2111 of 2020 Smt. Reena Gupta W/o Shri Ramnath Gupta Aged About 47 Years R/o Subhash Nagar, Bhagvanpur, Surguja, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Health Services Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Tahsil And District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Surguja, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 5 - Mustari Begum Presently Posted As Rho/ Anm (Women), Shc Kanthi, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Mr. SY Singh, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Amit Buxy, Dy. Government Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 19.02.2026 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by non-release of his salary for a period of 17 months by the respondent No.04 and, for which, he may be permitted to file a SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 representation and same may be directed to be decided within a reasonable. 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is permitted to file a comprehensive representation submitting his grievance with regard to grant of salary for the aforesaid period alongwith copy of this order and supportive documents before the concerned respondents authority within 04 weeks’ from today and, in turn, the concerned respondents are directed to consider and decide petitioner’s said representation in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order preferably within 06 weeks from the date of receipt of said representation. 4. With aforesaid observation and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No cost. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if