Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2020 DAILYLAW 535 (CHH)

KISHAN GUPTA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1311/2020 · 2026-03-26

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1311 of 2020 1 - Kishan Gupta S/o Shri Goverdhan Prasad Gupta Aged About 28 Years R/o Maa Sharda Garment, Main Road Rajgamar, District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Company Limited, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya , New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chhattisgarh State Electricity Production Company Limited Through Managing Director, Daganiya, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Collector District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Tahsildar Korba , District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - The Chief Engineer (Production) Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Maryadit Korba (East) District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Superintendent Engineer (Civil) Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukhariji, Thermal Power Plant Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Maryadit Korba (East) District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. 8 - The Executive Engineer (Civil - 2) Dr. Shyama Prasad Mukharji, Theraml Power Plant Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Maryadit Korba (East) District Korba Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Kumar Chaki, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 27/03/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hob'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents, for giving job and compensation to the petitioner 3 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief which deem fits by this Hon'ble Court” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat