Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3034 of 2020 Smt. Kavita Bai Yadav W/o Rakesh Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Kolbirra, Tahsil Marvahi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Women And Child, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Additional Commissioner Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Collector Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Marvahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Project Officer Integrated Child Development Scheme, Marvahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Smt. Sumitra Bai Sumer W/o Arjundas Sumer Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Kolbirra, Janpad Panchayat Marvahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Smt. Topkunwar Bai Gond W/o Ahibaran Gond R/o Village Kolbirra, Tahsil Marvahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 8 - Smt. Radhabai Gond W/o Chintamani Gond R/o Village Kolbirra, Tahsil Marvahi, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN
2 For Petitioner
: None in two rounds. For Respondent-State : Dr. S.K. Dewangan, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 09.04.2026
1. None appeared for the petitioner in two round when the matter was taken up today. Even on 02.04.2026 also there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
2. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in further prosecuting this matter. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge s@if