1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 691 of 2020 1 - Paras Ram Sahu S/o Dukhu Ram Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Tractor), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Ganga Prasad Kaushik S/o Late Chhedilal Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Owner Of Trolley), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Appellants Versus 1 - Smt. Reshu Goutam W/o Late Jitendra Aged About 21 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Prem Narayan Goutam S/o Bhaiyalal Aged About 52 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Shakuntala Goutam W/o Prem Narayan Goutam Aged About 50 Years Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Ku. Smita Goutam D/o Prem Narayan Goutam Aged About 26 Years S/o Ram Narayan, Near Ghongha Baba Mandir Parisar, Near Shyam Talkies, Police Station City Kotwali, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh., District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Sanjay Sahu S/o Late Ramayan Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Kharkhena, Police Station Hirri, Tahsil Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Driver), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Appellants : None in two rounds. For Respondents : None in two rounds. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal (Order on Board) 01.04.2026 1. None appeared for the appellants/claimants in two rounds. 2. It appears that appellants/claimants have lost interest in further prosecuting this appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge s@if