W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 Page Nos.1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 27.03.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 in W.P.No.14466 of 2014 1. T.Selvaraj S/o.Thambiran 2. Sundari W/o.T.Loganathan 3. Thulukanam W/o.Raja 4. K.Venkatachalapathy S/o.T.Kannappan 5. S.Raja S/o.M.Sagadevan ... Petitioners vs. 1. P.Janakiraman S/o.Ponnuranga Naicker 2. S.Balaraman S/o.Chokkalingam https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 Page Nos.2/4 3. The District Collector Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District. 4. The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk Kancheepuram District. 5. The Block Development Officer (Kunrathur Panchayat) Padapai, Kancheepuram District. 6. The President Valayakaranai Village Panchayat Sriperumbudur Taluk Kancheepuram District. … Respondents Writ Miscellaneous Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the ex parte order passed against respondents 5 to 9 in W.P.No.14466 of 2014 dated 05.11.2015 on the file of this Court. For Petitioners : Mr.Viswesh .K for Ms.M.Sneha For Respondents : Mr.T.Arunkumar Additional Government Pleader for R3 to R5 R1, R2 and R6 – Not ready in notice ***** O R D E R [Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,] The present writ miscellaneous petition has been instituted to set aside the order passed against the respondents 5 to 9 in W.P.No.14466 of 2014 dated 05.11.2025. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 Page Nos.3/4 2. Perusal of the said order would show that notice was served on respondents 5 to 7 and 9, while R8 was stated as “Not ready in Notice”. However, the Court had passed an order directing the official respondents therein to initiate action forthwith for removal of the encroachments, after giving one more opportunity of hearing to the alleged encroachers / respondents 5 to 9 therein to put forward their cases before the final decision / action is taken. 3. Thus, this Court had directed the authorities to provide an opportunity to the respondents 5 to 9, who are petitioners herein and therefore, the said order has not caused any prejudice to the rights of the petitioners in the writ petition. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition and consequently, the same stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 27.03.2026 Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes Speaking order mk https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 Page Nos.4/4 S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, J., and K. SURENDER, J., mk To 1. The District Collector Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District. 2. The Tahsildar Sriperumbudur Taluk Kancheepuram District. 3. The Block Development Officer (Kunrathur Panchayat) Padapai, Kancheepuram District. W.M.P.No.8586 of 2020 in W.P.No.14466 of 2014 27.03.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis