218. Madan Singh State of Haryana and others CORAM: Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY service despite there being a show cause notice dated 03.01.2020 (Annexure P appointment letter to the post of Mandi Supervisor u to which, he has already submitted a detailed reply showing his entitlement and for not proceeding therewith. In the interregnum, respondent No.4 has also joined. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Madan Singh Versus State of Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Hitesh Pandit, Advocate, for respondent No.2-UHBVN. Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is continu service despite there being a show cause notice dated 03.01.2020 (Annexure P-4) having been served upon him for withdrawing his appointment letter to the post of Mandi Supervisor u to which, he has already submitted a detailed reply showing his entitlement and for not proceeding therewith. In the interregnum, respondent No.4 has also joined. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-3596-2020 Date of decision: 28.07.2026 ... Petitioner ... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Vikram Sheoran, Advocate Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate, Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is continuing in service despite there being a show cause notice dated 03.01.2020 4) having been served upon him for withdrawing his appointment letter to the post of Mandi Supervisor under Category No.17, to which, he has already submitted a detailed reply showing his entitlement and for not proceeding therewith. In the interregnum, respondent No.4 has in service despite there being a show cause notice dated 03.01.2020 4) having been served upon him for withdrawing his nder Category No.17, to which, he has already submitted a detailed reply showing his entitlement and for not proceeding therewith. In the interregnum, respondent No.4 has PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-3596-2020 - 2 - 2. Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 while referring to Annexure R-/1, dated 24.08.2020, which was followed by the reminders addressed to Haryana Staff Selection Commission-respondent No.3, with regard to the withdrawal of the appointment letter, states that the decision could not be taken due to non-furnishing of information by the Commission regarding marks of the petitioner and the private respondent. 3. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 to furnish all details to respondent No.2, as have been sought, within a period of 4 weeks, whereupon the show cause notice be decided, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and taking into account his reply. 4. Till the decision is taken, status quo be maintained. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 28.07.2026 JUDGE sanjeev PARVEEN KUMAR 2026.07.29 16:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.