CWP-1303- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (213) Kamaljit Kaur State of Punjab and others CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. chargesheet dated 24.11.2020 (Annexure P Clause 8 of Rule 5 (V Appeal) Rules, 1970 JBT Diploma. 2. 24.11.2020, to which, the petitioner filed her response. Since then, the matter is pending with the District Education Officer concerned, to take further necessary action on the charg 3. instant writ petition can be disposed of with a No.3-District Education Officer the chargesheet. -2021 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kamaljit Kaur Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) Through the instant writ petition, challenge is thrown to the chargesheet dated 24.11.2020 (Annexure P Clause 8 of Rule 5 (V-VIII) of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1970, on the ground, that the petitioner JBT Diploma. The chargesheet was served to the petitioner, way back on 24.11.2020, to which, the petitioner filed her response. Since then, the matter is pending with the District Education Officer concerned, to take further essary action on the chargesheet. At this stage, this Court is of the considered opinion that the instant writ petition can be disposed of with a District Education Officer concerned, to take the chargesheet. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1303-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision : 23.07.2026 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab. instant writ petition, challenge is thrown to the chargesheet dated 24.11.2020 (Annexure P-9), issued to the petitioner under VIII) of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and , on the ground, that the petitioner does not have a valid The chargesheet was served to the petitioner, way back on 24.11.2020, to which, the petitioner filed her response. Since then, the matter is pending with the District Education Officer concerned, to take further his Court is of the considered opinion that the instant writ petition can be disposed of with a mandamus, upon the respondent concerned, to take further necessary action 1 instant writ petition, challenge is thrown to the , issued to the petitioner under VIII) of the Punjab Civil Services (Punishment and does not have a valid The chargesheet was served to the petitioner, way back on 24.11.2020, to which, the petitioner filed her response. Since then, the matter is pending with the District Education Officer concerned, to take further his Court is of the considered opinion that the respondent on MANPREET SINGH 2026.07.27 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-1303- 4. the reply, filed by the petitioner and decide to proceed further, petitioner, in that eventuality, the departmental proceedings, within a period of six month, thereafter. 5. 6. of. July 23, 2026 Manpreet -2021 (O&M) In case, the competent authority concerned is not satisfied with the reply, filed by the petitioner and decide to proceed further, in that eventuality, the authority concerned is directed partmental proceedings, within a period of six month, thereafter. Disposed of accordingly. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stands disposed 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable competent authority concerned is not satisfied with the reply, filed by the petitioner and decide to proceed further, against the the authority concerned is directed, to conclude partmental proceedings, within a period of six month, thereafter. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stands disposed (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No 2 competent authority concerned is not satisfied with against the to conclude Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, also stands disposed MANPREET SINGH 2026.07.27 17:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment