240-1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8677-2020 Decided on : July 23, 2026 RAM KUMAR AND OTHERS . . . Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present: Mr. AS. Chadha, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, DAG, Haryana. **** KIRTI SINGH, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that despite making best of the efforts, he failed to contact their clients to get required instructions to plead the case on their behalf. Learned counsel for the petitioners expressed his inability to assist the Court in the absence of any instructions from their clients. 2. In view of the circumstances and the position recorded hereinabove, this Court is left with no other option except to dispose of the writ petition for want of prosecution. 3. Dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move an appropriate application for seeking revival of the present writ petition, within a period of four weeks from today, in case, any substantive issue still exists along with a cause of action to the respective parties. (KIRTI SINGH) July 23, 2026 JUDGE Ritika Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RITIKA 2026.07.27 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh