220 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8994-2020 Date of decision: 14.07.2026 Subhash Chander ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: None for the petitioner. Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Balvinder Sangwan, Advocate for respondent No.2-HPSC. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned result dated 15.01.2020 (Annexure P-6) and impugned communication dated 24.12.2019 (Annexure P-4) declared and issued by respondent No.2, respectively as well as for quashing the announcement dated 26.12.2019 (Annexure P-5). Further, for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondent No.2 to call the petitioner for interview for the aforesaid post of Assistant Professor and a fresh candidate be selected on the basis of marks obtained in the interview after total evaluation of marks. In the meantime, respondent No.3 be restrained from working on the impugned post. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Commission submits that the order dated 20.05.2024 passed by this Court has not been complied with by the petitioner till date. NEHA 2026.07.15 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-8994-2020l -2- 3. Despite the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present writ petition. 4. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 14.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.15 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh