CRA-AD-103-2020 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 205 CRA-AD-103-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 16.07.2026 Dr. S.K. Kapoor ...Appellant VERSUS State of Haryana and Anr. ...Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR Present: Mr. Jagmohan Ghumman, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr. Rajat Gautam, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ , J.(ORAL) The complainant has preferred the present appeal against the judgment dated 15.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtak, in FIR No. 65 dated 31.01.1998 registered under Sections 366, 511, 120 and 120-B IPC at Police Station Civil Lines, Rohtak, to the extent that respondent-accused Kanwar Singh was held guilty only for the offence punishable under Section 323 IPC and was acquitted/discharged of the remaining charges, including those under Sections 364-A and 511 IPC. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that the complainant-appellant has since passed away and that he has instructions not to pursue the present appeal any further. He accordingly JYOTI 2026.07.17 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRA-AD-103-2020 2 seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid statement made by learned counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn accordingly. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 16.07.2026 JUDGE jyoti3 Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No JYOTI 2026.07.17 17:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document