CWP-13596 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 237 Mehboob Khan State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India is quashing impugned Order No. 3766 (Annexure P been transferred from the office of respondent No. 3 Haryana Roadways Nuh (Mewat) to the office of respondent No. 4 General Manager, Haryana Roadways Palwal, a dated 13.02.2020 (Annexure P the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 i.e. less than one year; AND transfer the petitio respondent No. 4 which is less than one year as, according to Policy/Rules dated (Annexure P less on the date of transfer drive, he 13596-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Mehboob Khan Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 Constitution of India is for issuance of writ in the nature of impugned Order No. 3766-68/AE (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of respondent No. 3 Haryana Roadways Nuh (Mewat) to the office of respondent No. 4 General Manager, Haryana Roadways Palwal, a dated 13.02.2020 (Annexure P-4) framed by the Haryana Government as the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 i.e. less than one AND further for issuance of direction to the respondents not to transfer the petitioner from the office of respondent No. 3 to the office of respondent No. 4 as, the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 is less than one year as, according to Policy/Rules dated (Annexure P-4) the employee whose date of retire less on the date of transfer drive, he is not to be transferred; 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-13596-2025 Date of Decision: 13.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Vikas Lochab, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Piyush Khanna, Addl. A.G., Haryana. filed under Articles 226/227 of the writ in the nature of Certiorari for 68/AE-VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 1) passed by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of respondent No. 3-General Manager, Haryana Roadways Nuh (Mewat) to the office of respondent No. 4- General Manager, Haryana Roadways Palwal, against the Policy/Rules 4) framed by the Haryana Government as the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 i.e. less than one further for issuance of direction to the respondents not to ner from the office of respondent No. 3 to the office of as, the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 is less than one year as, according to Policy/Rules dated 13.02.2020 4) the employee whose date of retirement is 12 months or not to be transferred; AND for of the for 02.05.2025 1) passed by respondent No. 2 whereby the petitioner has General Manager, gainst the Policy/Rules 4) framed by the Haryana Government as the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 i.e. less than one further for issuance of direction to the respondents not to ner from the office of respondent No. 3 to the office of as, the date of retirement of the petitioner is 30.04.2026 13.02.2020 for RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.14 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CWP-13596 staying the Order No. 3766 P-1) passed by respon petition. 2. that the Order No. 3766 challenged by the petitioner by way of present petition stands withdrawn by the respondent 30.04.2026. and may be disposed of, as such. 3. 4. having been rendered 5. 13.07.2026 rishu 13596-2025 staying the Order No. 3766-68/AE-VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure 1) passed by respondent No. 2 during the pendency of the present writ At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits Order No. 3766-68/AE-VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P challenged by the petitioner by way of present petition stands withdrawn by the respondent-State. Moreover, the petitioner 30.04.2026. As such, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. Heard. In view of the above, the present petition is having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 2 VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure dent No. 2 during the pendency of the present writ At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure P-1) challenged by the petitioner by way of present petition stands withdrawn State. Moreover, the petitioner has superannuated on uch, the present petition has been rendered infructuous In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No VI/E II dated 02.05.2025 (Annexure dent No. 2 during the pendency of the present writ At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits 1) challenged by the petitioner by way of present petition stands withdrawn has superannuated on uch, the present petition has been rendered infructuous as RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.14 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.