IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 214 CWP-9065-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 15.07.2026 EHC RAMESH CHANDER ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate and Mr. Viransh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel states that allegations against EASI Krishan was identical as to the petitioner, however, he has been only given warning while petitioner has been awarded penalty of stoppage of 5 increments with permanent effect. In this regard, he relies on Man Singh vs. State of Haryana and others, 2008(3) SCT 364. He, on instructions, thus, prays that his case be reconsidered and decided in light thereof, in a time bound manner. 2. The aforesaid facts having been brought out, during the course of hearing, learned State counsel, on instructions, states that the matter will be reconsidered and decided, within a period of 6 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the aforesaid submissions and judgment, uninfluenced by the orders impugned in the present case, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. 3. The aforesaid satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The matter stands disposed of accordingly and if the petitioner is found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same may be passed after granting opportunity of hearing to him and shall contain reasons, whereupon he shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 15.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.15 17:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document