217 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15982-2020 Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Anjali Rani ....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Present: Ms. Vanshika Daaria, Advocate for Mr. Nilesh Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana. HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) 1. The present civil writ petition has been filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for scrutiny of documents and interview against 341 posts of TGT English (Mewat Cadre) as advertised against advertisement No.9/2015 (Category-2) (Annexure P-1). Further, directing the respondents to decide representation dated 22.09.2020 made by the petitioner and allow the petitioner for scrutiny of documents and interview for the post of TGT English (Mewat Cadre) against the advertisement No.9/2015 (Category-2) and also directing especially ad interim directions to the respondents to allow the petitioner to attend the interview notified for 09.10.2020 and to issue admit card for the same subject to the final outcome of the present petition. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions. NEHA 2026.07.13 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh CWP-15982-2020 -2- 3. Learned State counsel at the outset submits that after withdrawal of the LPA No.433 of 2018 titled as Sikha Rani and another Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 23.04.2021 and LPA No.l861 of 2018 titled as Nidhi Sharma and others Vs. State of Haryana and others decided on 11.05.2022, the candidature of the petitioner was considered and she has been recommended for selection for appointment, as such, nothing survives in the present petition and the same has become infructuous. 4. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 5. However, the liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition in case the factual position as stated by learned State counsel is found to be incorrect. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE 09.07.2026 Neha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No NEHA 2026.07.13 11:14 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh