S. K. NAIN v. DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS
CWP/3004/2020 · 2026-07-08
Aman Chaudhary
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 2441 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 2441 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 225
CWP-3004-2020 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 S. K. NAIN ... Petitioner VERSUS DAKSHIN HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTHERS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Sunil Kumar Nehra Sirsa, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. R.S. Longia, Advocate for respondent
Nos.1 and 2.
**** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (RAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the present petition, his claim for seniority has been accepted vide order dated 25.01.2025, however, consequential consideration for promotion based thereon has not taken place as yet, in regard whereof, he shall submit a representation before the Authorities and prays that the same may be ordered to be decided in a time bound manner.
2.
Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions states that in case the representation is filed within a period of four weeks, the same shall be decided within six months in accordance with law.
3.
Ordered accordingly.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 08, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No
RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.08 19:07 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order