Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2020 DAILYLAW 2438 (PNJ)

HEMANT TYAGI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/14590/2020 · 2026-07-08

Aman Chaudhary

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 230 CWP-14590-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 08.07.2026 Hemant Tyagi ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : Mr. Pankaj Nanhera, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anurag Mor, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana Mr. Abhishek Singla, Advocate for respondent No.3 ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order was passed on 25.08.2020, Annexure P-14, while there is an order, which was passed subsequent thereto on 08.09.2021, Annexure P-16, which has a bearing on the matter, which is not being considered, in view of pendency of the present petition, as is apparent from the letter dated 22.09.2021, Annexure P-17, thus, a limited prayer is made to be reconsider the matter. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has no objection to the limited prayer made. 3. In view of the above and without commenting on the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the matter afresh, taking note of the aforesaid order dated 08.09.2021, MOHIT 2026.07.08 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-14590-2020 (O&M) -2- within a period of 4 months, uninfluenced with order impugned herein, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.08 18:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document