Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[260]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM-M-872-2020 Date of Decision : 23.03.2026
Daleep singh
....Petitioner VERSUS State of Punjab and others
....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU
Present: Mr. Veneet Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Rituraj Singh, DAG, Punjab. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral)
1.
The report has been received from the Mediation & Conciliation Centre of this Court being non-starter case.
2.
It is submitted by the learned State counsel that although the continuous efforts are being made by the police authorities to arrest the proclaimed offenders, however, they were not found at the places mentioned in their addresses filed by the complainant. Learned State also informed that statement of respondent No.4, who is councillor of the area, had also been recorded.
3.
In view of the submission made by the learned State counsel, the present petition is disposed of, in view of the continuous efforts being made by the police to arrest the proclaimed offenders.
23.03.2026
(MANDEEP PANNU) Anjal
JUDGE
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No ANJAL GUPTA 2026.03.24 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document