IN TH 226 Uttar Hary Ramphal CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. the concurr Courts wh declaration decreed by 2. submits tha whether ju 145 of the Hon’ble D ‘Mahesh judgment d RSA-1631-2020 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal No.16 Date of decision :-23.04.202 r Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. a Versus phal AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Ms. Neha Awasthi, Advocate for the appellants. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The appellants-defendants are oncurrent judgments and decrees ren ts whereby the suit filed by the ration with consequential relief of per eed by both the Courts below. At the very outset, learned that the question of law involved her jurisdiction of the Civil Court is of the Electricity Act, 2003, has s ’ble Division Bench of this Court in hesh Kumar vs. Sub Divisional O ment dated 14.05.2025. 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH No.1631 of 2020 (O & M) .2026 Ltd. and others …..Appellants …..Respondent E NIDHI GUPTA ocate (through VC) nts are in second appeal against es rendered by both the District by the plaintiff/respondent for of permanent injunction has been rned counsel for the appellants olved in the present appeal as to urt is barred in view of Section has since been decided by the urt in RSA-4181-2016, titled as nal Officer and Another’ vide VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 3. allowed, dismissed plaintiff is available, i 4. made in th res judica respondent 5. 6. Registered the Memo o April 23, 2 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-1631-2020 (O & M) In view of the above, the and the suit filed by the r issed on the ground of jurisdiction. is at liberty to take recourse to , in accordance with law. It is made clear that any evid in the impugned judgments and dec dicata in any subsequent proce ndent-plaintiff. Pending application(s), if any, Registry is directed to send a stered Post to respondent-plaintiff, at emo of Parties. , 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 the present second appeal is the respondent-plaintiff stands ction. However, the respondent- se to the appropriate remedy as y evidence recorded/observations nd decrees would not operate as proceedings initiated by the if any, shall stands disposed of. end a copy of this order through tiff, at the address mentioned in ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.04.24 16.38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document