Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2020 DAILYLAW 2329 (PNJ)

SURINDER PAL SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/4974/2020 · 2026-02-12

Aman Chaudhary

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 257 CRM-M-4974-2020 (O&M) Date of decision: 12.02.2026 SURINDER PAL SINGH ... Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul K. Adia, AAG, Punjab. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned State counsel refers to impugned order and states that since document had been supplied to the petitioner and moreover, not being relied upon, there is no cause with the petitioner to seek the same. 2. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, despite the case having been called out twice. 3. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 12.02.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.02.13 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document