FAO-1144 IN THE HIG 124 Preeti Paramjeet Si CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seeks enhanc her vide im Accident Cla 86 of 2020 d of the Motor 2. yet to be iss appeal an ap the Limitatio appeal has a appellant had Court:-:- 44-2022 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o Versus jeet Singh and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present enhancement of compensation amoun ide impugned Award dated 20.04.2 ent Claims Tribunal, Panipat, in a cla 2020 dated 21.10.2017/28.02.2020 file Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The matter pertains to year 20 be issued. Perusal of the record revea l an application bearing No. CM-3453 mitation Act for condonation of delay l has also been filed. On the last date o ant had gone un-represented and follow “The present appeal is o been a delay of 176 days in fil motion has not been issued so fa Since there is no repr applicant-appellant, in the inte 23.2.2026.” ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-1144-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.02.2026 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA esent appeal the appellant-claimant amount of ₹22,10,000/- awarded to 0.04.2021 by the learned Motor a claim petition bearing RBT No. filed under Sections 140 and 166 ar 2022 and notice in main appeal is reveals that along with the present 3453-CII-2022, under Section 5 of delay of 176 days in filing the main t date of hearing i.e. 12.08.2025, the following order was passed by this is of the year 2022 and there has n filing the appeal also. Notice of so far. representation on behalf of the interest of justice, adjourned to ant to otor No. 166 al is sent 5 of ain , the this as of he to RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.25 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-1144 3. the case havi 4. has exhibite litigation. It Court has be interest of ju casual and c counsel is s Court is left prosecution 5. 6. 23.02.2026 rishu 44-2022 (O&M) -2- Today again, the appellant had se having been called twice. A bare reading of the above xhibited an utterly casual attitude in ion. It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppor t of justice. On the other hand, the ap and careless approach. It is clear tha is seriously interested in pursuing t is left with no other option except t ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable nt had gone un-represented, despite facts shows that the appellant ude in her pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the opportunities to the appellant in the the appellant has adopted an utterly ar that neither the appellant nor her suing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No pite sent the the ly her this RISHU KATARIA 2026.02.25 13:03 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.