RSA-642-20 IN THE HIG 244 Amandeep S Mangat Sing CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. concurrent j whereby suit 2. the appeal o adjourned at 20.02.2020 s only to explo that the prese 3. been receive address’. No to furnish c hearing i.e. 0 2018 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o deep Singh and another Versus at Singh M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellants are in rrent judgments and decrees rendered suit for declaration filed by the plai The matter pertains to the yea peal only on 20.02.2020, as before ned at the request of learned counsel f 2020 shows that notice of motion in o explore the possibility of amicable se e present lis is between the sons and th As per office report, notice issu eceived back un-served with the rep No steps have been taken by learn nish correct address of the sole resp g i.e. 06.08.2025, the matter was adjou ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-642-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision: 30.03.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA are in second appeal against the ndered by both the District Courts e plaintiffs has been dismissed. e year 2018. Notice was issued in before that matter was repeatedly unsel for the appellants. Order dated tion in the main appeal was issued able settlement as it was pointed out and the father. ce issued to the sole respondent has he report ‘not residing at the given y learned counsel for the appellants le respondent. On the last date of s adjourned at the written request of the urts d in edly ated out has iven ants e of st of RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.06 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-642-20 learned coun behalf of the 4. have exhibit litigation. It Court has be the interest o utterly casua nor their cou Thus, this Co non-prosecu 5. 6. 30.03.2026 rishu 2018 (O&M) -2- d counsel for the appellants. Today, n of the appellants, despite the case hav A bare reading of the above exhibited an utterly casual attitude in It is to be appreciated that very has been expended in affording oppo terest of justice. On the other hand, th casual and careless approach. It is cl counsel are seriously interested in this Court is left with no other option e rosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable day, none has put in appearance on se having been called twice. facts shows that the appellants tude in their pursuit of the present t very valuable public time of the g opportunities to the appellants in and, the appellants have adopted an It is clear that neither the appellants sted in pursuing the present matter. ption except to dismiss the same for any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No e on sent the in d an for RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.06 13:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.