SURINDER SINGH AND OTHERS v. GEETA BHARATI AND OTHERS
COCP/1523/2025 · 2026-02-06
Nidhi Gupta
Contempt Petitionbody2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 2230 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 2230 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 202-I
Surinder S
Geeta Bha Finance an
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
violation o ordinate B Niwas Yad the same w (Annexure 16880-2020 Haryana an
said order entitled to COCP-1523-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
COCP No.1523 o
Date of decision nder Singh and others Versus Bharati, Managing Director, Ha nce and Development Corporation,
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Manish Kumar Singla, Ad for the petitioners.
Mr. Sanjeev Kaushik, Advoca Ms. Amisha Rana, Advocate for the respondent(s).
HI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Present contempt petition tion of order dated 22.8.2024 (Anne ate Bench of this Court in CWP s Yadav and others vs. State of Har same was disposed of in terms of exure P-2) passed by a Division Ben 2020 titled as “Yatindra Kumar Gu ana and others”.
Learned counsel for the petitio
order dated 19.5.2022 (Annexure P led to medical reimbursement from the
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 1523 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-06.02.2026 …..Petitioners r, Haryana Scheduled Castes tion, Panchkula and others …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA la, Advocate dvocate with ocate ition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-1) passed by a co- WP-6964-2023 titled as “Ram f Haryana and others”, whereby s of judgment dated 19.5.2022 n Bench of this Court in CWP- r Gupta and others vs. State of petitioner submits that as per the xure P-2), the petitioners were om the respondents. It is pointed VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.11 09.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
out that the the respond Leave to A Haryana an P-3), which observing give benefi counsel sub affirmed t reimbursem retirees of reimbursem
that the sai Haryana, P Scheduled having no submitted t of the petit Petitiion N already bee
pursuant to payment h petitioners COCP-1523-2025 (O & M) t the order dated 19.5.2022 (Annexu espondents before the Hon’ble Suprem e to Appeal (C) No(s).14826 of 2022 ana and others vs. Yatindra Kumar Gu , which was disposed of vide order d rving that “…We hope and trust tha nefits of the judgment to all retirees sel submits that therefore the Hon’bl med the directions of the Writ C bursement to the petitioners but has fu es of the respondent-Board shall bursement.
Per contra learned counsel f the said directions were issued in res ana, Panchkula; whereas the respo duled Castes Finance and Developm g no source of income unlike the Ho itted that vide order dated 13.6.2025 e petitioners from 22.8.2024 i.e. the da iion No.6964 of 2023 (Annexure P dy been released.
Learned counsel for the petiti ant to the Writ Court order dated ent has been given to the petitione ioners are entitled for the payment from
2 nnexure P-2) was challenged by upreme Court by way of Special f 2022 titled as “Housing Board ar Gupta and others” (Annexure rder dated 19.09.2022, whereby t that the petitioner-Board will irees of the Board….”. Learned on’ble Supreme Court not only rit Court to release medical has further directed that even the shall be entitled to medical nsel for the respondents submits in respect of the Housing Board respondent herein is Haryana elopment Corporation, which is the Housing Board. It is further .2025 (Annexure R-1) the claim . the date on which the Civil Writ ure P-1) was disposed of, has petitioners does not dispute that dated 22.8.2024 (Annexure P-1) etitioners, however, submits the nt from 30.5.2018 i.e. the day on VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.11 09.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
which thei was set asid
petitioners
to be issue petition is
February 0 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
COCP-1523-2025 (O & M) their claim was rejected by the res set aside by the Writ Court vide order d
Learned counsel for the resp ioners have not submitted any claim fo
In view of the above facts no f issued to the respondents. Accordi ion is disposed of.
Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, uary 06, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
3 the respondents and which order
order dated 22.8.2024. e respondents submits that the aim for the said period. ts no further direction is required ccordingly, the present contempt if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.02.11 09.09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document