Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2020 DAILYLAW 2226 (PNJ)

VIJETA v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CWP/17158/2020 · 2026-01-15

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

216 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-17158-2020 DATE OF DECISION : 26.02.2021 VIJETA …Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MONGA Present : Mr. Surender Pal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr.Harsh Vardhan, AAG, Haryana (Presence marked through video conference). ARUN MONGA, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel submits that he has instructions to state that during the pendency of the writ petition impugned advertisement dated 23.07.2015 has been withdrawn by the competent authority. The instant writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous, in view of the aforesaid statement. The same is disposed of accordingly with liberty to the petitioner to revive the proceedings in case his grievance still outsurvives after withdrawal of the advertisement. FEBRUARY 26, 2021 (ARUN MONGA) Vivek JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SHALINI BHATIA 2021.02.28 21:50 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document