CRM-M-61326- IN THE H (300) DEVINDER PAL STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. H Mr. A MANISHA BATR 1. The p Nagarik Suraksha 05.05.2020 registe Police Station M emanating therefr 188, 323, 506, 34 03.10.2025 (Anne 2. This appear before the Magistrate was d compromise. -2025 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH R PAL SHARMA AND ORS Versus
HARYANA AND ORS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Mr. Anshul Agnihotri, Advocate for t Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryana r. Anuj Y. Attri, Advocate for respo ****
BATRA, J. (ORAL)
The present petition has been filed u aksha Sanhita (for short “BNSS”) for registered under Sections 148, 149, on Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala therefrom including challan dated 20 06, 34, 325 and 201 of IPC on the (Annexure P-2). This Court vide order dated 03.11.20 re the trial Court to get their stateme was directed to send his report q JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRM-M-61326-2025 (O&M) Date of decision : 28.01.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents ANISHA BATRA
te for the petitioners r respondent No.2 to 5 filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya ”) for quashing of FIR No.256 dated , 149, 188, 323 and 506 of IPC at mbala and subsequent proceedings ted 20.07.2020 filed under Section on the basis of compromise dated .2025 had directed the parties to statements recorded and the learned port qua the genuineness of the s
s
atiya ated C at ings ction ated es to rned the AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-61326- 3. Pursu learned Judicial recorded. On the submitted report d effected between influence. 4. Learn has not disputed th 5. In vi continue with the p 6. Follo this Court in Kulw 2007 (3) RCR (Cr Gian Singh Versu is allowed and FIR 188, 323 and 506 subsequent proc 20.07.2020 filed u basis of comprom petitioners. 28.01.2026 Amit Sharma -2025 (O&M) 2 Pursuant to the aforesaid order, part icial Magistrate First Class, Amba n the basis of the statements so reco eport dated 03.12.2025 to the effect t tween the parties voluntarily and wi Learned State counsel as well as cou uted the factum of compromise betwee In view of the above, no useful th the proceedings before the trial Cou Following the principles laid down b Kulwinder Singh and others Versus (Criminal) 1052 and approved by ersus State of Punjab and others (2 FIR No.256 dated 05.05.2020 regis d 506 of IPC at Police Station Mahes proceedings emanating therefrom filed under Section 188, 323, 506, 34 mpromise dated 03.10.2025 (Annexu (MAN Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/ Whether reportable : Yes/No r, parties have appeared before the Ambala and got their statements so recorded, learned Magistrate has ffect that the compromise has been nd without any coercion or undue as counsel for respondent No.2 to 5 between the parties. seful purpose would be served to al Court in the instant FIR. own by the Full Bench judgment of ersus State of Punjab and another ed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in rs (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition 0 registered under Sections 148, 149, Mahesh Nagar, District Ambala and refrom including challan dated 06, 34, 325 and 201 of IPC on the nnexure P-2) are quashed qua the (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE : Yes/No e the ents has been ndue to 5 d to nt of her rt in tition 149, and ated n the the AMIT SHARMA 2026.01.29 10:38 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.