CS(COMM) 496/2020 Page 1 of 2 $~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010307122020 + CS(COMM) 496/2020 & I.As. 10474/2020, 1507/2021, 1509/2021 POPSOCKETS LLC .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Prashant Gupta and Ms. Shivangi Kohli, Advocates. versus FLIPKART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Naman Tandon, Advocate for D- 1. Mr. Dheeraj Nair and Ms. Ridhima Sharma, Advocates for D2 and D-6. Mr. Shiv Kumar Yadav, Advocate for D-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH O R D E R % 24.08.2026 1. This suit is instituted by the Plaintiff inter alia seeking permanent injunction against the Defendants from infringing Plaintiff’s trademark POPSOCKETS and POP formative marks as also their associated trade dress and 3-dimensional shape. 2. During pendency of the suit, Plaintiff and Defendants No. 1, 2 and 6 have amicably settled their inter se disputes and a Settlement Agreement has been executed on 04.08.2026 before Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, copy of which is on record. Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds the same to be lawful. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:21:06 CS(COMM) 496/2020 Page 2 of 2 3. Counsel for Plaintiff, on instructions, does not press any relief against Defendants No. 3 and 5. This stand is taken on record. 4. Counsel for Defendant No. 4, on instructions, submits that the said Defendant stopped using the impugned mark as soon as summons were received from the Court and undertakes not to use the impugned mark or any mark identical or deceptively similar to Plaintiff’s marks. Let an affidavit of undertaking to this effect be filed by Defendant No. 4 within three weeks from today with advance copy to counsel for the Plaintiff. 5. The suit is decreed in favour of the Plaintiff and against Defendants No. 1, 2 and 6 in terms of the settlement between them as also against Defendant No. 4 in terms of the undertaking given. Needless to state that parties shall be bound by the terms of the settlement and the undertaking respectively. 6. Registry is directed to draw up the decree sheet. 7. Suit along with pending applications stands disposed of. 8. Plaintiff is held entitled to refund of entire Court fees in accordance with Court Fees Act, 1870. JYOTI SINGH, J AUGUST 24, 2026/VP This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/08/2026 at 16:21:06