Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1917 (DEL)

NANDINI SHARMA v. DEEPAK GHAI

CONT.CAS(C)/239/2020 · 2026-07-21

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~29 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 239/2020, CM APPL. 13583/2021 (Early Hearing), CM APPL. 44984/2021 (Dir.) & CM APPL. 7027/2023 (Early Hearing) NANDINI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shimpy Arman Sharma and Mr. Kashvi Jindal, Advocates along with Petitioner in person. versus DEEPAK GHAI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shreedhar Gaggar, Advocate along with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 21.07.2026 1. The present Petition has been filed under Sections 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 read with Article 215 of the Constitution of India, 1950, for initiating contempt proceedings against the Contemnor/Respondent for willfully violating the terms and conditions of Memorandum of Agreement dated 18.12.2017 entered into between the parties and willfully resiling from undertaking given by the Contemnor before the learned Judge, Family Courts, Saket as recorded vide Order dated 23.07.2018 passed in HMA 1204/2018, titled “Ms. Nandni Ghai v. Mr. Deepak Ghai”. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent, on instructions, submits that in RC proceedings being RC-DRT 526 of 2019 which have been initiated in respect of loan taken from Catholic Syrian Bank, he will file an Undertaking to the effect that he This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:27:45 undertakes to discharge any and all liability that has arisen as a result of loan of Rs. 2 crores that was taken from the Catholic Syrian Bank and which undertaking will be in consonance with the Memorandum of Settlement entered as between the parties herein within a period of one (1) week from today. 3. In view of the said statement, no further orders are required to be passed in the present proceedings. 4. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. 5. It is made clear that in the event that there is any violation of the undertaking given to this Court or in the RC proceedings, the Petitioner is at liberty to revive the present proceedings. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. JULY 21, 2026/tk/va This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2026 at 11:27:45