16-REVN-34-2020 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2020 Anil Nainmal Shah ...Applicant/s VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondent/s WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2509 OF 2026 IN REVN/34/2020 Neha Anil Shah ...Applicant/s VERSUS Anil Nainmal Shah ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Vivek Kantawala a/w. Jash B. Vyas a/w. Mr. Manav Kantawala a/w. Mr. Harsha Masand i/by M/s. Vivek Kantawala and Co.. Advocates for Applicant and Respondent No.1 in IA Org. Applicant in CRA. Mr. Rushabh Vidyarthi a/w. Mr. Pashin Ichhaporva, Advocates for Original Respondent No.2 in Revision Application and Applicant in IA. Mr. S.R. Agarkar, APP for the State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 2nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : Criminal Revision Application No.34 of 2020. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned counsel for Respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the challenge in VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.09.09 11:22:44 +0530 16-REVN-34-2020 (CR).doc Tikam this application is the clause (D) of the impugned order directing that Respondent No.1 shall not circulate photographs and text messages concerning appellant and her friend in any manner. Learned counsel further submitted that the Applicant be permitted to confront the photographs and text messages to the Respondent in judicial proceedings between Applicant and Respondent No.1 and after confronting the proceedings, it may place on record and Application be disposed of. 4. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 submits that appropriate order be passed. 5. I have heard both learned counsel. As Applicant wishes to confront photographs and text messages to the Respondent No.1 in judicial proceedings pending between them only, considering this fact, the Applicant is permitted to confront the photographs and text messages concerning the Respondent and her friend in judicial proceedings pending between them only and not to circulate other and put it on record in the said judicial proceedings. 6. Criminal Revision Application is accordingly allowed and disposed of. *** 16-REVN-34-2020 (CR).doc Tikam Interim Application No.2509 of 2026. 1. By this Interim Application, the Applicant seeks recall the order dated 17/01/2026 passed by this Court [Coram: Manjusha Deshpande, J.]. 2. It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that learned counsel for Applicant in Revision Application No. 34 of 2026, Respondent herein made submissions before this Court on 17/01/2026 that Applicant- wife i.e. Respondent No.2 in the said application was not residing on the given address mentioned in the cause title. But in fact, she is residing on the same address as she is co-owner. 3. It is contention of learned counsel for the Respondent-husband that the Applicant was served on the new address, which was amended as per the order of this Court. Learned counsel further submits that the order passed by this Court is legal and valid and no need to recall the order and requested to reject the application. 4. I have heard both learned counsel. As Applicant is stating that she is residing on the earlier address, her contention is accepted. 5. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)