Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1838 (BOM)

SHAHELA FATEMA MOHAMMAD ISHAQ v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/2097/2021 · 2026-09-02

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) wp607.20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 7 WRIT PETITION NO. 607 OF 2020 TAHENIYAT BANU ABDUL HAFIZ SHATTARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 8 WRIT PETITION NO. 1560 OF 2020 MUKHTDIR ABDUL HAFIZ SATTARI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS 9 WRIT PETITION NO. 2097 OF 2021 SHAHELA FATEMA MOHAMMAD ISHAQ VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WRIT PETITION NO. 2027 OF 2021 SHRIKANT SUHAS PAWARA VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS AND WRIT PETITION NO. 3217 OF 2022 ABHAY ABASAHEB SHINDE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS Mr. S.B. Kendre h/f. Mr. R.P. Adgaonkar, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar and Mr. R.S. Wani, AGPs for the respondent-State. CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ. DATE : 07.09.2026 PC :- 01. Not on Board. Taken on Board. 02. Preacipe is moved for speaking to minutes of the order dated 02.09.2026. This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // ( 2 ) wp607.20 03. By way of order dated 02.09.2026, this Court disposed off the Writ Petitions. Though in other similar matters, interim arrangement is directed to continue for a period of six weeks, such order is remained to be passed in the present petitions. Considering the same, following sentence be added in the order dated 02.09.2026. “Interim arrangement to continue for a period of 6 (six) weeks from the date of the order.” 04. Office to carry out said addition in the order and fresh order be uploaded. [JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2026/Sep26/wp607.20 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //