Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1818 (BOM)

SANGITA W/O. GAMBHIR GAIKWAD v. DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURAGABAD REGION AND OTHERS

WP/338/2020 · 2026-08-27

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 917 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 338 OF 2020 SANGITA W/O. GAMBHIR GAIKWAD VERSUS DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER AURAGABAD REGION AND OTHERS ….. None for the petitioner. Adv. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondents-State ….. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 27/08/2026 Per Court: . None for the petitioner. 2. The petitioner is seeking a direction to decide his complaint within a stipulated period and to register an offence against the concerned persons. However, the report of Resource Personnel indicates that, since march 2020, the petitioner has not circulated this matter and even not removed the office objections also. 3. Thus, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently and therefore, the petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:39827-DB