Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1779 (BOM)

RAMKISHAN S/O. JALBA SHILEKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/355/2020 · 2026-08-31

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

355.20WP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 20 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.355 OF 2020 RAMKISHAN S/O. JALBA SHILEKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.Gautam V. Salve h/f.Mr.R.M.Jade APP for Respondent-State : Mr.S.J.Salgare Advocate for Respondent nos. 6 and 7 : Mr.Y.K.Bobade Advocate for Respondent nos.8 and 9 : Mr.V.B.Kulkarni … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 31.08.2026 P.C. : Heard. Though Mr.Gautam V. Salve, learned counsel holding for Mr.R.M.Jade, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Mr.Jade is not available today, but the Petition appears to be pending from the year 2020 wherein direction is sought to take legal action or initiate departmental enquiry against the respondent nos.6 to 9. Further direction to the Superintendent of Police, Nanded is also sought for initiating criminal proceedings against the respondent nos.6 to 9 pursuant to the representations of the 2026:BHC-AUG:39804-DB 355.20WP 2 petitioner. However, it appears that after 2021 the petitioner has not taken care to circulate the matter and today also the petitioner is not present before this Court. At present, the petitioner has not even taken care to give instructions to his own Advocate. Therefore, considering the gross negligence of the petitioner, it appears that he is not interested in prosecuting the matter diligently. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC