Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1771 (BOM)

CHHAGAN KISAN KOLI v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/137/2020 · 2026-09-01

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

913 wp 137-20 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 137 OF 2020 CHHAGAN KISAN KOLI VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Mr. D. A. Mane h/f Mr. Patil Milind, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, APP for Respondent-State …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 01/09/2026 PER COURT : 1. Though learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to take instructions, but it appears that the present petition was filed seeking provision of proper and suitable food, considering the petitioner’s immunocompromised health condition and his allergy to certain food items. 2. However, it appears that the said prayer was made when the petitioner was in Dhule District Prison from January 2017 till 22/06/2017. The report of the Resource Personnel of this Court indicates that upon obtaining information from Dhule District Prison as well as Jalgaon District Prison, no record pertaining to the petitioner is presently available. The report further indicates that the petitioner was in Dhule District Prison and Jalgaon District Prison in the year 2022 Even otherwise, no efforts have been made to pursue the matter since VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:39854-DB 913 wp 137-20 . 2020. In view of the passage of time, there is reason to believe that the petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|2