VIJAYPRAKASH KISANRAO THOMBRE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
APPLN/2292/2020 · 2026-08-28
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1765 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1765 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 822 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 822 OF 2020 Mahadev Balasaheb Gholve Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ Adv. Jadhavar Shivprasad G. for the Petitioner - Absent Ms. M. N. Ghanekar, APP for State Adv. Ashish S. Hazari h/f. Adv. Amol B. Chalak for Applicant in Cri. Appln. No. 2292/2020 __________________________________________________________ WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 2292 OF 2020 IN WP/822/2020 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1870 OF 2020 ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 28, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None appears for the petitioner. 2) The petitioner has filed this petition seeking directions for the registration of an offence against the present intervenor for alleged misappropriation in the Loknete Gopinath Munde Backward Co-operative Spinning Mill, based on a complaint dated 16.10.2019. However, the report submitted by the Resource Personnel of this Court Komal Kamble
2026:BHC-AUG:39028-DB
914 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 822 OF 2020 dated 21.08.2026 clearly indicates that pursuant to the said complaint, an FIR was already registered with the Kaij Police Station, and Regular Criminal Case (R.C.C.) proceedings arising out of it were initiated. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (J.M.F.C.), Kaij, conducted the trial and acquitted both the accused persons named therein, including the present intervenor. In view of the subsequent developments, nothing survives for
consideration in the matter. 3) The amount, if any, deposited by the petitioner to demonstrate his bona fides stands forfeited and shall be paid to the Library of the Government Pleader's Office at the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad. 4) The Criminal Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly along with pending criminal applications, if any.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble