MANIK PANDITRAO WASHIMBE v. CHATRABHUJ PANDITRAO WASHIMBE
SA/367/2020 · 2026-08-27
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1755 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1755 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 ) 901 sa 367.20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 SECOND APPEAL NO. 367 OF 2020 MANIK PANDITRAO WASHIMBE VERSUS CHATRABHUJ PANDITRAO WASHIMBE ….. Advocate for the Appellant : Mr. Bagal Vishal A. Advocate for the Respondent : Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure …..
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 27.08.2026 P.C.:-
1. Both the appellant and the respondent are present in the court.
2. The learned advocate for the appellant submits that a compromise has taken place between the parties. In view of this compromise, mutation entry no.1704 has been effected in the 7/12 extract and was sanctioned on 15.08.2026. He therefore submits that the appellant desires to withdraw the appeal.
3. In view of the above, the appeal deserves to be disposed of as withdrawn. The appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
mubashir 2026:BHC-AUG:38705