AJEET BHAUSAHEB JAGDHANE AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
CP/352/2020 · 2026-08-20
Contempt Petitionbody2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1753 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1753 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 352 OF 2020 IN WP/1270/2019 Ajeet Bhausaheb Jagdhane VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another __________________________________________________________ Adv. Sudhir K. Chavan for the Petitioner - Absent Mr. N. B. Patil, AGP for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : AUGUST 20, 2026 PER COURT : 1) None appears for the petitioners. 2) The direction is to decide the representation of the petitioner. 3) However, as per the communication dated 28.09.2020 issued to the petitioner by the Assistant Commissioner, Social Welfare, Beed, it appears that the representation of the petitioner has been decided. 4) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present petition. Contempt Petition, therefore, stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE Komal Kamble Page|1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:38970-DB