227.20CP 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 909 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 227 OF 2020 IN WP/8397/2016 DAGDUSAHEB LIMBAJI DHENGALE & ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioners : Mr.S.S.Chillarge AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde … CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,JJ. DATE : 18.08.2026 P.C. : Though the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks time to take instructions, but it appears that as per the order under contempt the respondents were directed to decide rental compensation. However, the order under contempt appears to be passed in the year 2017 and we are in the year 2026. Thus, by passage of time, the rental compensation must have been determined by the respondents. It is to be noted that the petitioners did not circulate this matter after 2020, and therefore, it appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the 2026:BHC-AUG:37449-DB 227.20CP 2 matter. In view of the same, the Contempt Petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C.MORE] JUDGE JUDGE DDC