Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2020 DAILYLAW 1722 (BOM)

RAMESH TUKARAM DIWATE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

REVN/15/2020 · 2026-08-24

body2020

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.20revn (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 56 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2020 RAMESH TUKARAM DIWATE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ….. Mr Ramesh Tukaram Diwate, Applicants/party-in-person Mr S. G. Sangle, APP for Respondent No.1 ….. CORAM : SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J. DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026 P. C. : 1. The applicant/party-in-person Mr Ramesh Tukaram Diwate is present before this Court. He submits that, he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision application. He then submits that, since he has an alternate remedy to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court, he may be permitted to avail of the same, and the time spent for pursuing this criminal revision application before this Court may be directed to be condoned under the provisions of Limitation Act. 2. In view of the above, this criminal revision application is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as is prayed for. 2026:BHC-AUG:38410 15.20revn (2) 3. It is made clear that, the time spent by the revision applicant in pursuing this criminal revision application shall be considered by the learned Sessions Court, if the question of delay arises. [SUSHIL M. GHODESWAR, J.] sjk