Telecom Regulatory Authority of India v. Union of India
IA/3713/2026 · 2026-08-24
body2020
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2020 DAILYLAW 1704 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 / 2 02-IA-3713-26-IN-WP-L-547-20.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.547 OF 2020 Digital Cable Operator’s Association of Mumbai & Ors. …. Petitioners versus Union of India & Anr. .... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.3713 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION (L) NO.547 OF 2020 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India ....Applicant/ Respondent No.2 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN : Digital Cable Operator’s Association of Mumbai & Anr. …. Petitioners versus Union of India & Anr. .... Respondents ….... • Mr. Ashish Mehta, Advocate for Applicant/Respondent No.2. • Mr. Rahul Soman, Advocate for Petitioners. • Mr. Amit Maru a/w A. N. Mehta i/b. M/s. Ethoes Legal Alliance, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL & RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, JJ. DATE : 24th AUGUST, 2026 Nesarikar MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Digitally signed by MANUSHREE NESARIKAR Date: 2026.08.25 11:08:59 +0530
2 / 2 02-IA-3713-26-IN-WP-L-547-20.odt P.C. :
1.
Learned counsel for the Applicant/Respondent No.2 states that the Petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the original Respondent No.2 has filed Interim Application No.3713 of 2026 in the same Writ Petition accepting the fact that the Petition has become infructuous at this stage.
2. The Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.
3. The Petitioners are at liberty to adopt appropriate remedy in future.
4. Along with the disposal of the Petition, the Interim Application is also disposed of.
(RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.) (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)